Should we as healthcare professionals, deliberately cause harm to a fetus to maintain the autonomy of the mother?
- research questions for phd thesis;
- The Ethical Dilemma On Abortion.
- northern renaissance art essay.
- essay about my family members;
- essays on flannery o connor revelation.
Is it just to deny complete autonomy to the mother while simultaneously denying justice and autonomy to a potential life? From a virtue ethical prospective, the answers to the difficult questions and actions taken depend on the innate moral values of the individual. For example, a Christian would derive their moral values from the Bible which describes life as preconceived before physical birth; whereas, an atheist would be more likely to believe happiness for the greatest number is the ultimate goal utilitarianism. Since abortion is viewed as such a morality issue, controversies arise between people with different moral codes.
As a potential healthcare professional, I realize I will be bombarded with patients considering abortions and those who have previously had one. I must know where my position, so when I am approached with the issue I can properly educate my patient while not compromising my values. As a Christian, my foundation comes from the Bible. Jeremiah proclaims, "I God knew you before you were formed within your mother's womb; before you were born I sanctified you and appointed you as my spokesman to the world.
Abortion: An Ethical Dilemma. Essay words - 8 pages. Loading: Checking Spelling. Read more. An Ethical Dilemma within the Army words - 6 pages Standards or Numbers: An Ethical Dilemma Every organization, both large and small, will typically have a well-defined set of values that they wish to espouse. This is the template for a successful, trained work force. These values will guide individuals during the decision-making processes that they will encounter. This blue print helps to ensure the integrity of the company and the individual, as well.
Our Army today is no different.
Abortion ethics. - PubMed - NCBI
Mandatory vaccination in Children — an ethical dilemma words - 10 pages Vaccination was first introduced globally for small pox and later on extended to other communicable diseases which are now known as vaccine preventable disease. Vaccination is beneficial both for individuals and community. This bring us to the ethical dilemma - Vaccination of a healthy child with the intention of protecting both the individual child and the community at the same time exposing the child to the theoretical risk of exposure to. The use of this machine brought about an ethical dilemma.
Is it ethical for terminally ill patients to end their own lives with the assistance of their doctor? Many patients when faced with this decision do not wish to go through the suffering or loss of abilities for doing every day activities. They want to die before they become incapacitated. Mill and Kant's Efforts to Solve an Ethical Dilemma words - 6 pages It is natural for human beings to subscribe to particular moral ideologies and to apply them to their day-to-day lives since we all live in societies that have norms and values. For many centuries, philosophers have tried to formulate frameworks upon which these moral principles can be based and measured.
This paper tries to apply the moral theories of John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant is solving an ethical dilemma. John Stuart Mill opens his. Developing an Ethical Framework and Applying It to an Ethical Dilemma words - 9 pages Introduction It is the purpose of this paper to explain the process by which I have come to develop my own ethical framework and apply this framework to an ethical dilemma. I have discovered through my research that an ethical framework is a collection of guidelines, usually in question format, that function together to support and reinforce the ethical decision-making process.
Ethical frameworks can be designed and applied in both personal. Jodie is an alert baby, with functioning heart and lungs.
Ethics: Nursing and Abortion
Mary has no effective heart or lung function and lives purely because of her attachment to Jodie. It is clear that if the twins were separated then Mary. Legality of Abortion words - 6 pages perform abortions on minors from out-of-state. Also in , thirty-three states enacted an informed consent law or policy.
Abortion Ethical Dilemma Essay
While it has always been the legal and ethical obligation of a physician to obtain permission from their patients before any procedure, it has not always been up to the state exactly what is to be said to the patient. Abortion opponents are advocating for those seeking abortion to be given information as part of informed. When it comes to the basic principles outlined under pro-choice, to consider late-stage abortions for ANY reason would constitute in the abandonment of their ethics and principles.
The considerations that pro-life constituents take is that there is no moral ambiguity. By not allowing a human life to be born because of anomalies would be the same thing is allowing someone to murder a5 year old for having been handicap Crutcher, Pro-choice and pro-life advocates both have a common ground when it comes to the question about what is constitutional in terms of violating a persons constitutional rights would also be in violation ofa persons ethical values. The fifth amendment to the U.
Constitution says that no person shall be deprived of his or her life without due process of the law. If the establishment was made on whether or not a human fetus could be considered a human life it would evaporate abortion at any stage for any reason Crutcher, People are very divided on whether legislation should be involved on a woman's right to start a family. Pro-choice defenders feel as if the state took away her right to her own choice that they would be denying her justice and autonomy and in some cases causing her harm. The pro-life defenders take the stand that because life is created from the moment of conception, the government not only has a the right to intervene on behalf of the unborn child it has an obligation Crutcher, Ethical Dilemma of Pro-Life.
Very different from the pro-life standpoint, there is not a great deal of ambiguity when it comes to the ethical principles outlined by pro-life campaigners. This distinction, as with pro-choice supporters, inevitably puts the life of the mother ahead of the life of an unborn child should the life of the mother be at risk. They feel there is a great deal of ambiguity in these phrases and by allowing abortion for health reasons could imply that discomfort experienced during childbirth and pregnancy could warrant an elective abortion.
Both sides of this debate can make very clear and concise arguments to the topic of abortion in general. When it comes to the topic of late-stage abortion both sides of this fence cringe at the thought of having to make a decision. When assessing both sides of the issue I have found that the mother's life is of the utmost importance; therefore, allowing the autonomy to make the choice. If situations during late-stage pregnancy arise that could have contributing factors on the health of the woman it would be in support of beneficence and non-maleficence, justice and her autonomy to make a decision for her life and for her health.
But what of the fetus you ask? Doesn't the fetus have rights being it is a human being? These questions also must be considered in late-stage abortion issues. There are many contributing factors that play a role in the ethics of these factors. I will first state my feelings on late-term abortion from the standpoint of a healthy woman and a healthy fetus.
The Ethical Dilemma Of Abortion
Late-stage abortion is considered an abortion after 20 weeks. The human fetus should be allowed the same rights as any other human being. By not considering the human rights and support late-stage abortion for any other reason but convenience is against the autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence and justice of that unborn child. I have always considered my self pro-choice and nothing has changed, even from this scenario. The healthy unborn fetus also has the rights for those same choices once the fetus is considered living, after 20 weeks.
I do not feel as if violation of rights would occur for the mother other than autonomy. In this instance, there is far more ethical dilemma and rights violations against the unborn, viable fetus. I guess I would put it that the majority of ethical violations rule in this case. I feel very different when it comes to the ethical conundrums with regard to the health of the mother or the quality of life for the unborn fetus. Should a woman be stripped of her rights to an abortion if her health and life are at risk you would be in violation of all her rights.
I also feel the same as to let the woman decide should major anomalies develop in her fetus that would cause the child discomfort and minimal quality of life expectancy. The morality in this situation would be the quality of life for the fetus. If the fetus was to be born and would experience a miserable existence, by not choosing to end the pregnancy would be against beneficence and non-maleficence as this child as well as the mother and family would endure a great deal of suffering. I take a utilitarian approach when it comes to this later example as the choice that would be the best would be of benefit to most; the family, the mother and especially the unborn fetus.
As you can see that ethical rules are not as binding as one would think. They are clearly guidelines that need to be followed that is met with an outcome that is in the best interest of all involved. Autonomy alone should not overlook the importance of all the other ethical factors.
As stated above the larger violation should have precedence over a singular violation for the standpoint of ethical question. You cannot look at moral obligations and ethics in a vacuum, there are considerations that could change your values based on who it will effect. Arthur, J. Pro Choice Action Network.
What pro-choice really means. Crutcher, M. Life Dynamics. Pro-life: What does it really mean.